E-commerce platforms in Chile: Wix leads with 5.2% in ChatGPT, Shopify in Gemini and WooCommerce in Claude
Chile · E-commerce platformsLeer en español
Do ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude recommend the same brands?
In e-commerce platforms in Chile, ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude name different leaders over the 4 weeks ending September 14, 2026: Wix, Shopify and WooCommerce. The most recommended brand depends on which engine the person asks.
Record figures
- WooCommerce
- 5.2%
- Answers naming the leader
- 44.4%
- Answers analysed
- 18
- Window
- 4-week window closed on September 14, 2026
- Models
- ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude
In the 4-week window closed on September 14, 2026, the e-commerce platforms category in Chile shows a different name at the top of each model. ChatGPT places Wix first, Gemini places Shopify first and Claude places WooCommerce first. Across the 18 answers analysed, Wix takes 5.2% of mentions, with 12 mentions, and appears in 8 answers. Shopify follows with 4.7%. WooCommerce matches Wix on share and on mentions and appears in fewer answers than either of them. The three names sit close together on the overall table and the order changes with the model consulted.
For brands competing in e-commerce platforms in Chile, the reference is split in three. Wix holds the head in ChatGPT, Shopify in Gemini and WooCommerce in Claude, and the distance between first and second on the full window is 5.2% against 4.7%. Shopify appears in more answers than Wix while holding a lower share: its mentions spread across a wider set of answers. A brand sitting outside these three faces a head that moves from one model to the next, with the same handful of platforms rotating at the top.
How I measured it
In the 4-week window closed on September 14, 2026 I gathered 18 answers from ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude about e-commerce platforms in Chile. The public benchmark measures every week which brands ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude name across 20 markets and 15 industries, in Spanish and in English. The models are queried through their APIs and without web search. Every mention is counted against a curated brand registry, with whole-word matching. Every brand that appears in a Quick Insight has been reviewed by a person. A brand's mention share is its part of the category's verified mentions in the period. The 95% interval is the margin of error of the share, calculated with the Wilson method. I calculate it on mentions and on answers. I publish a lead as clear when the second brand's share falls outside the leader's interval in both calculations. Inside it, it is a statistical tie.
Scope of the data
The figure covers the e-commerce platforms category in Chile, with prompts in Spanish, on ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, in the 4-week window closed on September 14, 2026; the models are queried through their APIs and without web search.
What to do with this figure
- Measure the brand with the same category prompts. Prompt Tracking runs prompts on the five engines.
- See which sources AI cites when it answers about the category. Prompt Tracking shows, for each prompt and model, the sources the answer cited, and AI Market Leaders groups them by brand.
- Review the site's technical signals with the GEO Score and the GEO Framework. The GEO Score scores the site from 0 to 100 on the four pillars of the GEO Framework. See Marco GEO
About AuraMetrics
AuraMetrics measures how a brand appears in AI answers and validates the technical implementation behind that presence. The GEO Score is calculated on the GEO Framework, a public four-pillar methodology. It analyzes the sources AI cites. It measures visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Perplexity and Claude. It checks whether a shopping agent can buy from a store, with UCP checks. It turns citation gaps into a content plan with drafts. It generates llms.txt, OKF and ARD files. It delivers shareable reports and runs as white label for agencies. It publishes a weekly benchmark across 20 markets and 15 industries, and the Observatory of brands in AI.